Everything is Everyone and Each One is All
Community of People interested in UFO and Time Travel Research and related subjects
the brandon cory story
Added by lacerta
UFO & Paranormal Show - 2/24/2008
Added by Renato Ferraz
Started by Seven in Time Travel. Last reply by Renato Ferraz Jun 4.
Started by thx1138 in General Paranormal. Last reply by Brian McPherson May 18.
Posted by Amsie Raomy Raomoya on June 30th, 2008 at 11:31am —
1 Comment
(Add)
Posted by Mudpuppy on May 9th, 2008 at 5:13am —
No Comments (Add)
Posted by Mudpuppy on May 9th, 2008 at 5:00am —
No Comments (Add)
Posted by Mudpuppy on May 9th, 2008 at 4:57am —
No Comments (Add)
Hi there!
Please would you help us compile research into how society and individuals would react under the extraordinary circumstances of 'Disclosure'. we had a tremendous response from our members to the recent 'How many OM members have seen a UFO' - Kudos everyone! Now let's take this one step further...
OK - Let's assume Disclosure Day is upon us!
UFO sightings have gone through the roof over the last 18 months - we saw the wave begin right here on OMF, with the 'SERPO' disclosures leading the way to new paradigms and thinking 'out of the box'. Since then, UFO reports and Disclosure initiatives have snowballed to the incredible and most significant 'show' and rise in profile wrt UFO awareness / consciousness in Human history - never before witnessed.
UFO's are at an all-time 'high' in the MS media:
Only a few days ago - a major report from the UK. Police heli-pilots involved (and presumably visually recorded!) in a 'near miss' with a UFO. - Click for - BBC REPORT.
OMF predicted these kind of events over a year ago - based on the 'significant' wheat extracted from the 'plausible deniable 'chaff' coming from our various and highly credible International sources / intel networks / consultants.
Undoubtedly we really ARE witnessing major Disclosure related events leading to 'D-Day' - the undeniable proof of a well planned and thousands of years old co-ordinated final 'Show'. The biggest leap in Human evolution - since our genes were originally programmed by our Handlers / Creators.
But will we be emerging from our terrestrial / material consciousness to face a Wonderful and Prosperous new dawn for Earth? Or entering our worst nightmare?
Can we handle the 'Truth'? Are we ready? Are YOU?!
What would you do? How would you react?
Try and think clearly about what you would do - if your answer does not appear above - what is your answer?
You can vote for up to 4 options.
(Please DO post this poll/link to as many 'like-minded' people/websites as you know - let's try and get as many people to vote as possible - that way we can compile perhaps the largest database / response / poll ever conducted. 8-) )
http://projectcamelot.net/michael_st_clair.html
After the initial success of our Futuretalk with David Wilcock, we decided to continue our Futuretalks as a series of conversations - not interviews - with people who have something important to say.
A Futuretalk with Michael St Clair seemed to be an excellent next step. Michael, as those of you will know who are already familiar with our first interview with him at Chillion Castle in Switzerland, is a fascinating futurist and metaphysician as well as a famed astrologer.
Michael has been thinking about the future in a multitude of ways for many years, has written several important and well-received books, and recently has re-entered the world of banking to advise private clients with an eye to the coming changes in world economies and ways of doing business.
We cover the whole range from safe spaces (which Michael prefers to call radiant zones), to what might be happening and what one should consider preparing for in the future, coming bank failures, possible geopolitical events that could change our lives, and other concerns.
Michael has spent several years viewing the scenarios - both positive and negative - that one might need to consider in the years ahead. He shares his thoughts and his own personal vision, as well as some key points that everyone should keep in mind in the coming days.
To contact Bill Ryan or Kerry Cassidy, please e-mail us at support@projectcamelot.org.

Hey guys!
Show tonight, I hope you all can make it. Tonight we will be discussing e-mailed experiences, Renato's energy machine, more evidence of time travelers, the mahabharata, and more! please tune in and give your input and feedback, Thanks!
THX
Sens works to repair and reverse the damage of aging so that we dont become feeble and break down as we age, and live on indefinitely. This is the biggest cause humanity has ever embarked on. Its been on the bbc, Colbert Report, Barbara Walters Special, the Alex Jones show, TED talks and many more. These cause boxes are an amazing way to show your support so if you do then please do join this right away.
'SENS (Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence)'!
Join the SENS cause and get a badge for your profile showing your support.
reply posted on 19-5-2008 @ 12:42 PM by cindymars
I am a bit afraid to ask this question but why was onthedeck banned. I did not take part of the thread he started but enjoyed reading it and spoke with him thru private emails. I sent him a U2U he never recieved?
He was always polite and nice. Sorry I am new here but I do not get it. It feels very unfair to me.
Originally posted by cindymars
I am a bit afraid to ask this question but why was onthedeck banned.
reply posted on 19-5-2008 @ 01:33 PM by SkepticOverlord
We typically don't discuss the reasons for a member's banning, unless there is very-good reason to do so.
Sorry.
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
Can you elaborate on what the very good reasons would be?
reply posted on 19-5-2008 @ 02:05 PM by SkepticOverlord
1) Someone who's constantly posting disruptive 1-liners or off-topic posts in threads, even after being asked not to. It's not really a T&C violation, but it's a disruptive tactic.
2) Someone for whom we get an inordinate amount of member complaints, but perhaps each complaint is "borderline." This requires an unfair situation where our staff is so occupied with this particular member, the rest of the site doesn't get the appropriate attention.
3) Someone who is repeatedly posting intense ATS criticism, even after their posts have been addressed.
Originally posted by endrun
What about the folks over at A.K. who say they were banned for no violations, and never received a warning or a notice that they had been banned?
reply posted on 19-5-2008 @ 02:05 PM by SkepticOverlord
I guarantee you that everyone knows why they've been banned. If they say they don't know, they're either trying to deceive people, or not being honest with themselves.
...
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
So are you saying in this reply:
reply posted on 19-5-2008 @ 02:05 PM by SkepticOverlord
1) Someone who's constantly posting disruptive 1-liners or off-topic posts in threads, even after being asked not to. It's not really a T&C violation, but it's a disruptive tactic.
2) Someone for whom we get an inordinate amount of member complaints, but perhaps each complaint is "borderline." This requires an unfair situation where our staff is so occupied with this particular member, the rest of the site doesn't get the appropriate attention.
3) Someone who is repeatedly posting intense ATS criticism, even after their posts have been addressed.
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
That it is only in these situations that a members banning will be discussed in public?
I hope I dont come across as annoying, just like to be clear and thorough.
CT
...
reply posted on 19-5-2008 @ 02:26 PM by SkepticOverlord
Oh... I assumed you were referencing the giant-post.
No... not the same then.
The reasons for being forthright about the banning of a member would include:
1) If there was a "public outcry" for the banning of a particularly disruptive member. In these cases, the reason is usually clear, but we inform as to the timing.
2) If a member was found to be hoaxing the board, we'd inform everyone as to the nature of the hoax.
3) If a member was inappropriately engaged in some other activity that was deceptive to members.
Those are but a few examples.
...
reply posted on 19-5-2008 @ 02:26 PM by SkepticOverlord
2) If a member was found to be hoaxing the board, we'd inform everyone as to the nature of the hoax.
3) If a member was inappropriately engaged in some other activity that was deceptive to members.
February 07, 2008
Letter from John about recent events at ATS (AboveTopSecret.com)
To all my friends at ATS:
All I want is for you to know the truth about what happened Monday, January 28, 2008 to cause my being banned at ATS.
Both Springer (Mark Allin) and Skeptic Overlord (Bill Irvine) who have both been my good friends for more than a year have been much, much less than truthful about what happened that day and why.
They have been much, much less than truthful in other comments they have made about me in their posts over the past few days.
No, I didn't voluntarily resign as Conspiracy Master at ATS. And Springer is less than truthful when he says "it was completely his choice and his choice alone." And no I didn't speak or email or contact Mark in any way after January 28.
There is speculation that I got tired of all the insults and thats why I left ATS. Nonsense.
First, the insults didn't bother me, and second, I never left ATS. It's just that I can't post or send or receive U2's anymore. But I'm still there. Everyday.
If Mark and Bill are not more forthcoming about why I was banned on the morning of January 28, 2008 (Springer calls it "drama", I call it "truth") then I will post all the emails that Bill sent to me and that I sent to Bill that day. And you can make up your own mind whether or not my banning from ATS was fair or why it even happened...
...
I woke up early Monday morning January 28, 2008 and found that I could not post on ATS. I then checked my U2's and found the following post from Bill Irvine. It concerned my post on page 10 of the " Michael Horns Billy Meier [HOAX] photos from C2C tonight"...
17 Feb 1967, about 9:45 PM, Palmer, Massachusetts: Mrs. Stella V. Lansing, a housewife, part-time nurse, and mother of five children, the oldest then in Vietnam, was parked with her car on Old Warren Road, just off Route 32, in the double-row, high-voltage power-line area. This was about a kilometer east of Palmer Center, away from street lights and houses, alongside Burleigh park, and no more than a kilometer from her home at Thompson Lake. Earlier this evening she had seen a yellow-orange globe of light near the old cemetery and now hoped to see it again. She had been puzzled frequently by strange lights in the Palmer area and this time brought a borrowed movie camera. She was ready.
Fig. 1. Sighting Area
Waiting patiently under a black, starlit sky with the moon nearly half full, she saw three distinct globes of yellow-to-reddish-orange light coming from the southeast, along the power line. Except for an occasional cricket-like sound they were silent, as low as the power line poles and no more than 20 m from them. Mrs. Lansing recalls: "They generally glided, sometimes bouncing in a dipping manner, as though riding the crest and ripples of a water wave." She started filming the approaching objects and was amazed when they suddenly retreated: "They bounced back like a rubber ball on a rubber string."
...
The resulting movie was first viewed on an old projector, which unfortunately tended to burn the individual frames when the stop-motion lever was held too long on "still". Lansing evidently captured the zigzag motion by using the single-frame lever, but that's all her photo shows -- a zigzag -- with no unambiguous structural detail.
The 16 fps sequence, about 4½ sec long, has very low contrast, appearing as a yellow rectangle in the upper-left-hand corner of the projected movie. In her studies of the film, Lansing had switched to a battery-operated, hand-held viewer, to avoid burning any more frames, and only moving, ghostlike images were apparent. Months later, a modern projector was purchased. She recalls: "I had a shock of disbelief as I was finally able to see four beings, two of which were turning their heads and moving their lips as though conversing, and which then appeared to be looking down at me."
Fig. 2 shows one frame from this 4½ sec sequence. Fig. 3, sketched by artist Frederick E. Fahdt, assists the reader in locating the three occupants in Fig. 2. The fourth figure, not visible here, is standing to left in the movie scene. None appears to be the grey alien type usually reported in close encounters nor, with dark hair, are these the occasional blond "Nordic" types. Most striking is this veridical human character of the images, even more evident from their animated movements during projection. Who are these people? Could they be archeologists from Earth's distant future? With their casual and non-uniform garb, they look more like university researchers than a military crew.
fig 2. from movie
FIG. 2
fig 3 - artist rendering
FIG. 3
Lansing's movie was shown informally at the end of the APRO 1971 "Eastern UFO Symposium", where one of the featured speakers was psychiatrist / UFO researcher Berthold E. Schwarz, M.D. He subsequently visited Mrs. Lansing twice in Palmer on five days of February and April 1971, and studied her further at his New Jersey office during five days of May 1971. These investigations were usually attended by members of her family or close friends. Schwarz even enlisted the help of famed telepathist Joseph Dunninger, as a positive check on her veracity. Schwarz's on-site field trips to Palmer, numerous telephone calls and correspondence, interviews of her associates, and his psychiatric evaluation and continuing interest in this case, are documented for UFO researchers by seven articles in Flying Saucer Review (see Stewart's index). Dr. Schwarz's conclusions and comments in brief:
* Stella Lansing told the truth as she saw it, and was quite modest about it: "These things happen and I don't know why"
* Lansing had a history of paranormal experiences -- telepathic, precognitive, telekinetic, teleosomatic -- all within the range reported for psi-sensitive people
* Subjects can be driven into psychosis by our failure to believe them; Lansing was affected by her strange experiences and required hospitalization. Schwarz clearly emphasizes that these experiences were cause, not result, of her psychosis, which subsequent treatment completely cured
* Attempts to hypnotically regress Lansing were too traumatic and had to be abandoned
* Lansing had taken many films and photographs of UFO-like and bizarre, non-UFO-like objects such as described by Ivan T. Sanderson
* Careful, frame-by-frame analysis is necessary to see some of her photographed objects, which otherwise are overlooked
* Facts of the case do not support a thoughtography (paranormal exposure) explanation: (1) Ted Serios claimed to produce single-exposures, while Lansing's 4½ sec sequence has many frames of complex movement, (2) Lansing and Schwarz simultaneously filmed anomalous objects on-site in Palmer with separate movie cameras and got consistent results
* Question: how did Stella Lansing's psychopathology / psychophysiology make her a candidate for UFO interaction?
I've been asked to post my version of what I remember about my abduction. I'm not trying to get famous of this bullshit. Many people say I'm doing this for attention. You'd have to be an idiot to try and get famous from an abduction story. I'm not here to prove shit I'm her to document what happen. Say what you want. I stay away from the topic of religion & God. People seem to judge my by my religious beliefs. I'm a regular guy; I'm probably the last guy in the world you'd think that would be abducted. I will answer your questions if interested. Save your breath with negative comments, waste of your time and mine. Hope to here from more of you.. I WILL BE CLOSING THIS YOUTUBE SITE Sept. 19th, 2008.
The very popular podcast and website Mysterious Universe, hosted by Australian Benjamin Grundy, was down for a week and half. It was unknown what had happened. I tried to email one of the messageboard moderators and haven't heard anything back. Today it relaunched to a new format, and also a new episode christening the regeneration of the site. As of right now, the messageboards are not back up yet, but once they do, I'll be back as your inside man, or Time Lord.

4 May
Benjamin Fulford: epilogue to our recent interview
We asked Benjamin Fulford for a status report on the current state of affairs regarding whether there had been any change as a direct result of the public stand he took speaking out on behalf of the Asian Secret Society about the world situation. In answer, he wrote the following in an email dated today:
For the reaction, you will notice that Asian countries have stopped buying US government bonds. The US secret government has retaliated by artificially raising food and oil prices.
We are in the middle of World War 3. The US and Israel have been taken over by Nazis and the rest of the world is trying to take them down.
The reason the society has not started assassinations yet is that the Nazis in the Bush/Clinton administration want any excuse to start all out world war. However, if starvation begins in earnest, there will be assassinations.
Benjamin Fulford
Renato Ferraz
created this social network on Ning.
Spread the word. Get your own UFO and Time Travel Community badge for your website or MySpace page. (Get Code)
© 2008 Created by Renato Ferraz on Ning. Create your own social network